Security Deposit | Maintenance Amount | Available From | Available For |
₹ 0 | ₹ 0 | No Preference |
Dear Owner members of Bramha Suncity Pune & Managing Committee,
Seems this mail was not transmitted through apna complex on 11th and 15 th Feb. Appears the portal is blocked or used for selective transmission to the benefit of MC. So trying to reach out Suncity residents via Classified. Deeply regert inconvenience to others. Rest please ignore the mail as it is not revelant to you all.
Concern :
1) So called notice " New Notice: Implementation of AGM resolution"was sent by treasurer in individual capacity from personal email ID. What it really means I fail to understand? It should have been sent by MC official from an office email ID. Also it should have discussed transparently and consensus must have been derived within if not from residents after debating pros and cons.
I solicit views of residents as such one sided isolated acts will impact society financially adversely in short and long term. Below is the content ( slightly amended for this forum)
_____________________
There are no flats with double registration in Bramha Suncity society.
It is actually 2 flats purchased and modified to make them appear as one for convenience/ benefit to buyer or seller. Had this not been the case then the society would not have 1277 flats. Same can be vetted out in official records too. This is also evident from the very fact that such units have double share certificates (because they are actually 2 flats). Else why one flat is allotted double share certificate for no reason and bias??
If this practice is continued then all will start buying two adjacent flats, break in-between wall and start portraying them as one flat. This won't be acceptable to anyone, I suppose. Such structures can be called as 'one unit' but would remain as 'two flats' and should be treated/ charged as per two flats.
Also such flat owners must ensure that they have the new plan approved from municipal Corporation to avoid any inconvenience to society is major modification without approval is not allowed.
Such practice would unnecessarily burden the residents who own a single flat and single unit and should be avoided as fair practice and looking into it's long term consequences.
The immediate impact on residents and Society will be the loss of "Transfer fees" while sale of such Unit / Flat. Considering 14 such units are sold/ year (a nominal no) , society will lose 100 lacs of earning in a year which is going to impact all of us adversely.
I am not talking about other issues and impact coming out by virtue of equating "premises expenses" amonst the flats existing in Suncity Society.
Further, I feel that such decisions have to taken in Sgm/ Agm so that all are aware of the logic, impact and the outcome.
Also waiting a response and calling of Sgm/ Agm for the subject as it would impact all of us.
Thx and regards,
Firoz Khan
Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone
---- KALPANA SUBRAMANIAN wrote ----
New Notice posted by KALPANA SUBRAMANIAN
Implementation of AGM resolution
Dear Members,
This is to inform you that the MC in its meeting of 6/2/2016 has unanimously decided that the resolution of AGM dated 29/9/2015 will be followed w.r.t to maintenance charges and transfer fees for flats with double registration. Additional bills raised will be reversed. Excess payments made, if any, will be adjusted against maintenance charges of April to October 2016. This has been discussed with the Dy Dist Registrar and has also been communicated in writing.
We appeal to all our members who have not cleared their outstanding dues to do so immediately.
Thanking You,
Sincerely,
Kalpana Subramanian
URL for this classified: https://www.apnacomplex.com/classifieds/view/15400/Bramha-Suncity-Co-Operative-Housing-Society-Ltd-Pune-Concerns-in-Notice-Implementation-of-AGM-resolution